Opinions about f2p getting alignment., Everyone's opinion, sorry I'm obessed with this. |
Opinions about f2p getting alignment., Everyone's opinion, sorry I'm obessed with this. |
![]() ![]() |
3 Nov 2009, 23:53
| #81
well back on topic. It's not the fact that they got PvP without paying but rather the fact they have it at all. F2P aligned are often obnoxious (being new to PvP and all) and have no idea what they are doing or how to aggro properly. In addition, most of them just serve as fodder for the P2P stroken accounts because P2P have access to money, gear, and of course pets and Dragoturkeys from which F2P would find limited or in the case of turkeys and pets, restricted from.
I just don't think that the "demand" for F2P pvp warrented them to actually grant it. |
![]() |
3 Nov 2009, 23:53
| #82
|
![]() |
3 Nov 2009, 23:57
| #83
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 Nov 2009, 00:02
| #84
Wow, how extremely interesting.. Click reply on the post you wish to reply then copy and paste. Then go to your post and edit it, on the edit paste it and type under where it says quote in a bracet like this "[]" it will count as another reply. This should help prevent from spamming or multi posting. I hope this helped. -xdark-osamodax |
![]() |
4 Nov 2009, 01:20
| #85
Many f2ps can't get over the fact that some p2ps are obnoxious about being p2p and are stuck on that point. Yes, some p2ps are obnoxious about f2ps, and yes some p2ps are attacking f2ps for not paying. That does not mean that every single person that decides to subscribe will adopt this attitude. There has been attempts to change the topic back to "Do you think it's fair that f2p get new content while those who've subscribed have gotten no new content, just revamped old content", but it seems to me like any person who supports f2p getting new content can't read past "Do you think it's fair that f2p get new content" and continue to rage at a stereotypical obnoxious p2p bigot while ignoring the point at hand. Personally I don't think the f2p players should get the new content before the p2p players get some, because they do not pay, and if they are unable to pay but wish to, that's bad luck and we all have to live in the circumstances that hold our life. That doesn't mean you should get content before those who pay for it just because the circumstance doesn't allow you to pay. And for those who think that the p2p should be happy with the content that they have and let the f2p players get something for free, would you work for the person that's paying you first or the person that wants the job done free?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 Nov 2009, 01:28
| #86
Many f2ps can't get over the fact that some p2ps are obnoxious about being p2p and are stuck on that point. Yes, some p2ps are obnoxious about f2ps, and yes some p2ps are attacking f2ps for not paying. That does not mean that every single person that decides to subscribe will adopt this attitude. There has been attempts to change the topic back to "Do you think it's fair that f2p get new content while those who've subscribed have gotten no new content, just revamped old content", but it seems to me like any person who supports f2p getting new content can't read past "Do you think it's fair that f2p get new content" and continue to rage at a stereotypical obnoxious p2p bigot while ignoring the point at hand. Personally I don't think the f2p players should get the new content before the p2p players get some, because they do not pay, and if they are unable to pay but wish to, that's bad luck and we all have to live in the circumstances that hold our life. That doesn't mean you should get content before those who pay for it just because the circumstance doesn't allow you to pay. And for those who think that the p2p should be happy with the content that they have and let the f2p players get something for free, would you work for the person that's paying you first or the person that wants the job done free? I wouldn't mind them getting extra but if they were to do so I'd say the subscriber should gain something first then the non-subscriber to at the point where they still have 5% of the whole thing. -xdark-osamodax |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 Nov 2009, 02:55
| #87
Lets put it this way. Im waiting in the VIP (P2P) room. Im waiting for food or whatever service i need. The 4th class (f2p) are also waiting for the same thing. The fact that we've both been waiting for the same time is evident. When the time comes, who gets served first? 4th class...
|
![]() |
4 Nov 2009, 04:36
| #88
Why can't the p2p just accept that dofus has changed allignment to F2P now, i bet the same thing happend when dofus first came out when everything was F2P then about 5 months in they changed to p2p.
Sook Much? and lol to the people who pay money to pvp. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 Nov 2009, 04:51
| #89
Before you f2pers try to flame me for just asking opinion answer me this.
Do you really deserve more contents? If so why? -xdark-osamodax This post has been edited by thisgameizfun: 4 Nov 2009, 04:51 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 Nov 2009, 08:56
| #90
Im alright with them getting new content, or whatever, but p2p, is the biggest, and most stupidest they could give! Take it away soon, amakama, if you really want to show more to f2ps, why not just add a new mob or sumthing? Amakama does need to improve even f2p once in awhile, just to keep them hanging. Not too much, just a little. Enough to keep them playing. PvP the main source of scriptions, dont give them THAT!
This post has been edited by simomate: 4 Nov 2009, 09:02 |
Member
Arachnophobe![]() |
6 Nov 2009, 01:32
| #91
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22 November 2009, 06:57 |