does anyone know if the Feca class will be nerfed because the number 1 support class has =/

I think ut great that the team at ankama is finally taking into consideration the balancing of each class in order to give people more choose about wat they want to be but what about the lack of water spells that certain classes have in the game.

i mean there are very few water spells that are even out there for other classes expect enus. I would like to see some interest in water builds just as there is a very high interest for earth, fire, and air builds. There are probably more earth and intell builds than there are agi of chance builds.

Sacriers are now support. Deal with it

In addition, the punishment shall apply throughout their duration, a penalty of life insoignable 10%. This constraint allows us to induce players to choose between the role of "tank" and the main source of damage. By exposing and maximizing the effects of punishment, the Sacrieurs are more difficult to play a role of "tank" over time. We want these two roles can be played by the class Sacrieur, but not simultaneously or only taking greater risks than before. The new punishment will provide management flexibility between these two roles, which do not depend on the equipment Sacrieur and its allies, but the way they play, exposure and control the distribution of damage within the group. Players will have to make tactical decisions with permanent play when a character Sacrieur to determine to what extent they share the roles of "Tank" and the main source of damage in the group.

btw bit off topic but werent you the guy who told the Xelors to adapt when the ap reduction nerf came?
so arent you bit of hypocrith when you are fiercely trying to oppose the changes of sac XD
and saying that it's impossible to adapt to this?

Wiki definition of a tank.

In gaming jargon, a tank is a player or unit designated to protect weaker players or units in combat by drawing enemy attacks and absorbing damage. Compared to other units, tanks have a high damage tolerance and specialize in melee combat. The tongue-in-cheek term meat shield is roughly synonymous with tank, often carrying the additional connotation that the unit is relatively expendable or inconsequential and its death is preferred to the death of the units it protects.

Tanks are common features of game genres that include tactical combat. Examples include the Ultralisk from the real-time strategy game StarCraft, the Necromancer's summoned golems and the Druid's summoned Grizzlys from the action role-playing game Diablo II, and Deoxys and Blissey (among many others) from the Pokémon video game series.

Tank can also be a verb: "to tank" is for a strong or resilient unit to take a lot of damage in lieu of a weaker or less-resilient one. An example is when one unit stands still and takes the bulk of the damage while other units attack. The unit taking damage is "tanking damage," or simply "tanking."

In computer role-playing games, tanks are warrior character classes with fighting skills and high hit points. An example of a tank in action is a swordsman with archers behind him. The swordsman has heavy armour and a shield, and thus takes less damage from his foes and protects the archers behind. The characters a tank protects might include a healer who keeps the tank (and other party members) alive, damage dealing classes with a lower damage tolerance (magic-users or rogues), or a weaker character taking advantage of the opportunity to powerlevel. Tanks in many cases have abilities to focus the attention of their opponent mobs on themselves as a way of protecting the other characters.

The term originally came in use with players of MUDs (Multi-User Dungeons), the text based predecessors of MMORPGs, and was used as early as 1994 on Usenet to describe the warrior class on DikuMUDs which had high hit points and the rescue skill, which allowed transferring one attacking mob from another players to the rescuing character.

About as much support as a pair of fat mans Y-fronts that the elastic has snapped around the waist! Hanging round the proverbial feet of the team if chosen , which in honesty we won't be as a panda, ecaflip or iop will now be a better choice.

I don't need to deal with it MR "I'm getting the best deal out of all these updates with my overpowered eca spells"!

I can take my money else where as are a lot of players come the 7th. Let me quote ankamma here just for the discrediting of your inflammatory remark



Where does it say we are support? Oh....I don't think it does! It says we are ether or tank/damage dealer. No where in ankammas "VISION" does it say we are support. Shame we can do neither tanking nor damaging roles now in team pvp or pvm.

I hazard a guess that both murlough and JebinZedalu are one in the same. Though I may be wrong. Did you switch to an alt to try and grasp some credibility? Maybe not, but who cares. I don't! Ether way, I hope the ecaflips and iops get hit hard in the future by ankammas "VISION"!

RaelCleap 19X R.I.P. sacrier on 28/3/09

I sure hope the Developers come to their senses. If the Nerf... I mean Update goes through as it is, not only will end game content be next to impossible without a massively overcapped group, but a lot of high level players will quit. Even some of my closest friends are threatening to leave. Others, like half the players in the Guild Blank already abandoned ship. This is depressing.

I will benefit from this update, but with end game content being unrealistic and my friends leaving, there isn't a single reason for me to stay.

Well the map manipulation spells have been improved. Evasion too. Their special spell is a support spell as well. And I believe that quote is simply stating you have to choose between tank or damage dealer as in not both. They aren't saying you can't play Sac as a support character

Really my post was more of a joke than anything, though. Your sense of discernment is flawed. Not that I can convince you differently, but I am not JebinZedalu. Taking a look at his previous posts, a plethora of faces, short sentences, and actually ending his stanzas with punctuation greatly differentiates the type of format he types in from mine

I wasn't aware sharing the same opinion with someone else makes you them. You seem intelligent enough, but your assumptions are way off

I'm Str by the way. Little "deal" there

Wow man, this must be the first time we have actually agreed on something.

You will have a very lonely solo play style or you will be a switch monkey leach.

These are the cold hard FACTS of what the sacrier will become.

You can't take the fact that my temper runs high and I have been pushed to snapping, oh well. Try and discredit me and stand back and let your little alt sacrier get ruined.

Your inability to see the dramatic changes to the class and the implications they pose end game baffles me. You must be an alt looking for trollish fun.

Well if you want to be an ignorant lump of hp with no use other than switching more fool you.

You know I started the debates on these forums in a speculative manner, stating the facts of the changes and showing hope.....that died fast and after hours upon hours of testing and lame changes getting worse and having to deal with little ignorant jerks like yourself looking for a rise I became angered. Very angered. Angered at your inability to listen.

To the ignorant remarks made based on falsified rumor and gossip.

Sac Class Spell

Taunt

Makes all enemy's on the map attack the caster of the spell

AP Cost: 1
Range: inf
Duration: 1
Cool Down: 2
Critical Hit: 30
Critical Fail: 60
Level 1:
* All enemy's on the map attack the caster
* Lowers all enemy's damage by 5% (Critical Hit: 15%)

Level 2:
* All enemy's on the map attack the caster
* Lowers all enemy's damage by 10% (Critical Hit: 20%)

Level 3:
* All enemy's on the map attack the caster
* Lowers all enemy's damage by 15% (Critical Hit: 25%)

Level 4:
* All enemy's on the map attack the caster
* Lowers all enemy's damage by 20% (Critical Hit: 30%)

Level 5:
* All enemy's on the map attack the caster
* Lowers all enemy's damage by 25% (Critical Hit: 35%)